In hopes of not having to enact slow-no-wake restrictions multiple times a year, the Long Lake City Council updated the city’s ordinance pertaining to the restrictions on the lake.
The council approved raising the level at which the slow-no wake restriction goes into effect from 945 feet to 945.25 feet and removing the three-day waiting period language from the ordinance to make monitoring and enforcing the slow-no wake restriction easier during times it is in effect.
“The fact is that we are under no-wake often, several times a year, and that’s not the way the no-wake restrictions are supposed to work,” council member John Dyvik said. “Three inches, I don’t believe will make much of a difference on the lake shore owners but will make a big difference on how often the lake is closed down and I think that is bad for Long Lake and bad for our local businesses to be shutdown sometimes for a extended period of time, several times a year, when most lakes have a no-wake restriction that goes into effect once every five years.”
Resident Jane Davidson spoke against raising the level three inches.
“When the no-wake goes into effect, I always breath as a lake owner a sigh of relief,” she said. “I would urge great caution about changing the ordinance.”
The council also approved changing the definition in the ordinance of watercraft, which had brand references, to the state statute of watercraft.
Those changes were prompted earlier this spring when the lake went into slow-no wake restrictions and they found out that the previous no-wake restriction were no longer enforceable.
According to city staff, Long Lake and Orono city councils adopted slow-no wake restrictions in their respective city codes governing Long Lake in 2014, which stated that no person shall operate a watercraft at greater than slow-no wake speeds whenever the water level of the lake exceeds 945.0 feet and remained at that level for at least three consecutive days.
In 2017, the city of Long Lake adopted a new code regarding hours of operation of personal watercraft (jet skis) on the lake.
Long Lake communicated those changes to Orono and Orono implemented a similar update. When Orono implemented those changes, the city inadvertently deleted the Long Lake specific slow-no wake ordinance language from their code, rendering Long Lake’s slow-no wake ordinance unenforceable for the time being.
That was situation was discovered on Monday, May 9 and the city has been in contact with Orono to call awareness to the situation.
Long Lake city clerk Jeanette Moeller said the city of Long Lake will be in touch with Orono about the recent update to Long Lake’s ordinance in hopes that they would adopt a similar ordinance so that a slow-no wake restriction can be enforced on Long Lake if it goes into effect.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.